AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review – Tahiti’s Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

IMG 0923 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review   Tahitis Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

Today's review will focus on how the official increased clock frequencies of the 7970 GHz edition aka Tahiti XT2 – 1050MHz on the core (13.5% increase from 925MHz) and 1500MHz on the memory (9% increase from 1375MHz), help peg back or increase the performance delta over Nvidia's GTX 680 Kepler. We run a plethora of benchmarks on the latest beta drivers (Catalyst 12.7 and 304.48) from both camps, sometimes with interesting results to report.

Whats New?

gpuz AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review   Tahitis Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

HD 7970 Tahiti XT
113-C3860100-100 
Tahiti B0 CR XT C38601 GDDR5 3GB
300MHz / 150MHz : 0.850V
925MHz / 1.38GHz : 1.170V
HD 7970 GHz Edition Tahiti TX2
113-C3862000-004
Tahiti B0 XT2 C38620 GDDR5 3GB
300MHz / 150MHz : 0.950V
1.05GHz / 1.5GHz : 1.256V
 
By now, you will all have read and experienced that the original HD 7970 had fantastic overclocking potential, with most cards able to scale to 1100MHz on the core without voltage increases. We note in the bios p-states dump that the peak core voltage during 3D loads have been raised to 1.256v from 1.17v, so how will this affect TDP and heat output? Well, AMD introduced a new power management technique with their new Catalyst 12.7 beta drivers…

boost Page 06 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review   Tahitis Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

boost Page 07 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review   Tahitis Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

…Unfortunately, our efforts to find out more from the horse mouth about the exact scenarios when and how the boost will kick in was met with silence.

Edit: (they did give Anandtech some dirt though)

DTE works as a deterministic model of temperature in a worst case environment, as to give us a better estimate of how much current the ASIC is leaking at any point in time. As a first order approximation, ASIC power is roughly a function of: dynamic_power(voltage, frequency) + static_power(temperature, voltage, leakage).



Traditional PowerTune implementations assume that the ASIC is running at a worst case junction temperature, and as such always overestimates the power contribution of leaked current. In reality, even at a worst case ambient temp (45C inlet to the fansink), the GPU will not be working at a worst case junction temperature. By using an estimation engine to better calculate the junction temp, we can reduce this overestimation in a deterministic manner, and hence allow the PowerTune architecture to deliver more of the budget towards dynamic power (i.e. frequency) which results in higher performance. As an end result, DTE is responsible for about 3-4% performance uplift vs the HD7970 GHz Edition with DTE disabled.



The DTE mechanism itself is an iterative differential model which works in the following manner. Starting from a set of initial conditions, the DTE algorithm calculates dTemp_ti/dt based on the inferred power consumption over a previous timeslice (is a function of voltage, workload/capacitance, freq, temp, leakage, etc), and the thermal capacitance of the fansink (function of fansink and T_delta). Simply put, we estimate the heat into the chip and the heat out of the chip at any given moment. Based on this differential relation, it’s easy to work back from your initial conditions and estimate Temp_ti, which is the temperature at any timeslice. A lot of work goes into tuning the parameters around thermal capacitance and power flux, but in the end, you have an algorithmic way to always provide benefit over the previous worst-case assumption, but also to guarantee that it will be representative of the entire population of parts in the market.



We could have easily done this through diode measurements, and used real temperature instead of digital temperature estimates…. But that would not be deterministic. Our current method with DTE guarantees that two parts off the shelf will perform the same way, and we enable end users to take advantage of their extra OC headroom on their parts through tools like Overdrive.

 

Spot the differences between the regular 7970 and 7970 GHz

IMG 0956 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review   Tahitis Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

IMG 0952 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review   Tahitis Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

IMG 0958 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review   Tahitis Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

IMG 1239 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review   Tahitis Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

IMG 0932 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review   Tahitis Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

Nope, the old and "new" cards are completely identical hardware wise. We've confirmed this fact with AMD and several AIB partners. Whats allegedly different is the hand-picked better ASICs that goes into the GHz edition cards.

 

ASIC Quality and Overclocking

asic AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Review   Tahitis Boost from Overclocking and Drivers

Out of the three cards we've laid our hands on, the ASIC quality readings ranged from 59.8% to 61% – lower than the 70-80% that we've had on our bunch of other older 7970s. That said, we could run the new cards at 1.3V with MSI Afterburner without tripping the overvoltage protection and attained core frequencies of between 1260MHz and 1290MHz, slightly higher than the older cards.

 

How much will the new cards cost?

Starts from US$499. This places the 7970 GHz edition head on with the GTX 680's official MSRP.

Prev1 of 8Next
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse
Why can't I have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads